Suchergebnisse

The state of Ukraine is a system object. Therefore, there are grounds to study it using the methods of system technique (system analysis and modeling). The question of determining the development stage of system of the state of Ukraine is of crucial significance. In theory, there are five main stages: origin, formation, maturity, crisis, transformation. The stage of occurrence of the need-request of a larger metasystem in respect of the new system functions. The stage of the system formation up to the required (calculated) state. Stage of design system operation with a quality level not less than planned one. During this period, due to aging or wear of the system elements and changes in the needs of the external environment, the system experiences a critical situation and the question arises: «What's next?» The stage of state change in the system. At the fourth stage, there are three options for changing the system state. Option one. The system is forced to bend to circumstances and follow the path of regress aging and losing its qualities and inevitably approaching the moment of its death. Option two. Upon availability of the necessary resources, attempts of the system to maintain itself in the state in which its primary target operation is still possible. Option three. Transformation to another quality (if there is a decision of the management system in this regard and upon availability of the necessary resources), to a higher level due to changes in the state, properties of elements, structure and functions in order to achieve new functions. Stage at which either a new system existence phase, that meets the needs of the metasystem, takes place or a new stage of the life cycle of a new (other) system, that appears as a result of the disposal of the old one, begins. Accordingly, the systems are divided into those that are at the stage of origin, those that are at the stage of formation, those that are at the stage of maturity, those that are at the stage of crisis, and those that are at the stage of transformation. In our opinion, the indicators of social, economic and political development of the country confirm the existence of the crisis as a stage of the system development of the state of Ukraine with prospects for the situation development according to the scenarios of the fourth or fifth stages. Earlier we have considered crime as a separate system object. According to this approach, crime prevention should be understood as measures aimed at neutralizing the resources of this system, managing circumstances, performers, relations with the external environment and its inverse relations. According to another approach, we have considered crime as a problem of a system object of the state of Ukraine. In this case, crime prevention should be understood as protection of existing social relations from illegal (criminal) changes in the elements state and avoidance of damage to lawful social relations by crimes. ; В статье описаны этапы развития системы государства Украина. Раскрыты особенности соииально-политических процесов с учетом тенденций преступности. Сделан вывод о перспективах развития системы государства Украина с учетом аннексии Крыма и войны на Донбассе. ; У статті виявлено системність у процесах історичного розвитку нашої держави за часів незалежності; встановлено поточну стадію життєвого циклу системи держави Україна та перспективи її розвитку з урахуванням тенденцій криміногенних процесів. Перший етап функціонування системи держави Україна (етап виникнення) виявився у запиті метасистеми (українського суспільства) на її утворення як окремого системного об'єкта. Це відбулося під час національного відродження другої половини 80-х років ХХ ст. Розбудова системи Української держави на другому етапі її новітньої історії (етап становлення) розпочалася після референдуму 1 грудня 1991 р. Третій етап (етап зрілості) мав місце в період економічного зростання 2000–2008 рр. Четвертий етап (етап кризи) мав місце в останні роки першого десятиріччя ХХІ ст. Він характеризувався наявністю соціально-економічних проблем і високим рівнем протестних настроїв серед населення. Початком п'ятого етапу (перетворення) можна вважати 2014 р., коли було утверджено курс країни на євроінтеграцію та боротьбу з корупцією.

The state of Ukraine is a system object. Therefore, there are grounds to study it using the methods of system technique (system analysis and modeling). The question of determining the development stage of system of the state of Ukraine is of crucial significance. In theory, there are five main stages: origin, formation, maturity, crisis, transformation. The stage of occurrence of the need-request of a larger metasystem in respect of the new system functions. The stage of the system formation up to the required (calculated) state. Stage of design system operation with a quality level not less than planned one. During this period, due to aging or wear of the system elements and changes in the needs of the external environment, the system experiences a critical situation and the question arises: «What's next?» The stage of state change in the system. At the fourth stage, there are three options for changing the system state. Option one. The system is forced to bend to circumstances and follow the path of regress aging and losing its qualities and inevitably approaching the moment of its death. Option two. Upon availability of the necessary resources, attempts of the system to maintain itself in the state in which its primary target operation is still possible. Option three. Transformation to another quality (if there is a decision of the management system in this regard and upon availability of the necessary resources), to a higher level due to changes in the state, properties of elements, structure and functions in order to achieve new functions. Stage at which either a new system existence phase, that meets the needs of the metasystem, takes place or a new stage of the life cycle of a new (other) system, that appears as a result of the disposal of the old one, begins. Accordingly, the systems are divided into those that are at the stage of origin, those that are at the stage of formation, those that are at the stage of maturity, those that are at the stage of crisis, and those that are at the stage of transformation. In our opinion, the indicators of social, economic and political development of the country confirm the existence of the crisis as a stage of the system development of the state of Ukraine with prospects for the situation development according to the scenarios of the fourth or fifth stages. Earlier we have considered crime as a separate system object. According to this approach, crime prevention should be understood as measures aimed at neutralizing the resources of this system, managing circumstances, performers, relations with the external environment and its inverse relations. According to another approach, we have considered crime as a problem of a system object of the state of Ukraine. In this case, crime prevention should be understood as protection of existing social relations from illegal (criminal) changes in the elements state and avoidance of damage to lawful social relations by crimes. ; В статье описаны этапы развития системы государства Украина. Раскрыты особенности соииально-политических процесов с учетом тенденций преступности. Сделан вывод о перспективах развития системы государства Украина с учетом аннексии Крыма и войны на Донбассе. ; У статті виявлено системність у процесах історичного розвитку нашої держави за часів незалежності; встановлено поточну стадію життєвого циклу системи держави Україна та перспективи її розвитку з урахуванням тенденцій криміногенних процесів. Перший етап функціонування системи держави Україна (етап виникнення) виявився у запиті метасистеми (українського суспільства) на її утворення як окремого системного об'єкта. Це відбулося під час національного відродження другої половини 80-х років ХХ ст. Розбудова системи Української держави на другому етапі її новітньої історії (етап становлення) розпочалася після референдуму 1 грудня 1991 р. Третій етап (етап зрілості) мав місце в період економічного зростання 2000–2008 рр. Четвертий етап (етап кризи) мав місце в останні роки першого десятиріччя ХХІ ст. Він характеризувався наявністю соціально-економічних проблем і високим рівнем протестних настроїв серед населення. Початком п'ятого етапу (перетворення) можна вважати 2014 р., коли було утверджено курс країни на євроінтеграцію та боротьбу з корупцією.

The modeling of social processes in rulemaking is still not perfect. The aim of the article is to improve the normative regulation of crime prevention measures. The purpose of the article is to analyze the Constitution of Ukraine as a verbal model of the state system of Ukraine. We justify the Constitution as a pragmatic verbal model of the system of the state of Ukraine on the basis of the theory of system engineering.A model is a specially designed object for research and problem solving (material or abstract) that has the required degree of similarity to the modeled object and is adequate for the purpose of the study. Pragmatic models are a form of organizing (displaying) knowledge of the intended (created) object system. Therefore, the Constitution of Ukraine, laws and regulations are pragmatic verbal models.The construction of a model of the system can be carried out subject to the preliminary definition of: 1) the context of the model; 2) the author's point of view; 3) modeling goals.The system model should have the following properties: 1) simplicity; 2) limited; 3) adequacy; 4) loyalty. In the Constitution of Ukraine as a model of the state system, these properties are provided in different ways. Adequate is called a model where completeness, accuracy, and truthfulness are realized to the extent that ensures the achievement of the goal of modeling.The purpose of constitutional modeling is to build a verbal model of the state system that would reflect the compelling circumstances in which the system functions - the purpose, elements, and relationships. As a goal of the system of the state of Ukraine, Article 3 of the Constitution outlines human rights and freedoms.Elements of the System of State Ukraine are: Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, President of Ukraine, National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, local state administrations, courts, Constitutional Court of Ukraine. Connections of elements of the system of the State of Ukraine. Legislative, executive and judicial bodies shall exercise their powers within the limits established by this Constitution and in accordance with the laws of Ukraine (Article 6 of the Constitution) ; В статье на основе методики системного анализа обосновывается понимание Конституции как прагматичной вербальной модели системы государства Украина. Рассматривается её соответствие требованиям, которые предъявляются к моделям системных объектов. Обозначена принадлежность этой модели к разным классификационным группам ; У статті на засадах методики системного аналізу обґрунтовано розуміння Конституції як прогностичної вербальної моделі системи держави Україна. Розглянуто її відповідність вимогам, які висуваються до моделей системних об'єктів. Окреслено належність цієї моделі до різних класифікаційних груп

The modeling of social processes in rulemaking is still not perfect. The aim of the article is to improve the normative regulation of crime prevention measures. The purpose of the article is to analyze the Constitution of Ukraine as a verbal model of the state system of Ukraine. We justify the Constitution as a pragmatic verbal model of the system of the state of Ukraine on the basis of the theory of system engineering.A model is a specially designed object for research and problem solving (material or abstract) that has the required degree of similarity to the modeled object and is adequate for the purpose of the study. Pragmatic models are a form of organizing (displaying) knowledge of the intended (created) object system. Therefore, the Constitution of Ukraine, laws and regulations are pragmatic verbal models.The construction of a model of the system can be carried out subject to the preliminary definition of: 1) the context of the model; 2) the author's point of view; 3) modeling goals.The system model should have the following properties: 1) simplicity; 2) limited; 3) adequacy; 4) loyalty. In the Constitution of Ukraine as a model of the state system, these properties are provided in different ways. Adequate is called a model where completeness, accuracy, and truthfulness are realized to the extent that ensures the achievement of the goal of modeling.The purpose of constitutional modeling is to build a verbal model of the state system that would reflect the compelling circumstances in which the system functions - the purpose, elements, and relationships. As a goal of the system of the state of Ukraine, Article 3 of the Constitution outlines human rights and freedoms.Elements of the System of State Ukraine are: Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, President of Ukraine, National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, local state administrations, courts, Constitutional Court of Ukraine. Connections of elements of the system of the State of Ukraine. Legislative, executive and judicial bodies shall exercise their powers within the limits established by this Constitution and in accordance with the laws of Ukraine (Article 6 of the Constitution) ; В статье на основе методики системного анализа обосновывается понимание Конституции как прагматичной вербальной модели системы государства Украина. Рассматривается её соответствие требованиям, которые предъявляются к моделям системных объектов. Обозначена принадлежность этой модели к разным классификационным группам ; У статті на засадах методики системного аналізу обґрунтовано розуміння Конституції як прогностичної вербальної моделі системи держави Україна. Розглянуто її відповідність вимогам, які висуваються до моделей системних об'єктів. Окреслено належність цієї моделі до різних класифікаційних груп

The modeling of social processes in rulemaking is still not perfect. The aim of the article is to improve the normative regulation of crime prevention measures. The purpose of the article is to analyze the Constitution of Ukraine as a verbal model of the state system of Ukraine. We justify the Constitution as a pragmatic verbal model of the system of the state of Ukraine on the basis of the theory of system engineering.A model is a specially designed object for research and problem solving (material or abstract) that has the required degree of similarity to the modeled object and is adequate for the purpose of the study. Pragmatic models are a form of organizing (displaying) knowledge of the intended (created) object system. Therefore, the Constitution of Ukraine, laws and regulations are pragmatic verbal models.The construction of a model of the system can be carried out subject to the preliminary definition of: 1) the context of the model; 2) the author's point of view; 3) modeling goals.The system model should have the following properties: 1) simplicity; 2) limited; 3) adequacy; 4) loyalty. In the Constitution of Ukraine as a model of the state system, these properties are provided in different ways. Adequate is called a model where completeness, accuracy, and truthfulness are realized to the extent that ensures the achievement of the goal of modeling.The purpose of constitutional modeling is to build a verbal model of the state system that would reflect the compelling circumstances in which the system functions - the purpose, elements, and relationships. As a goal of the system of the state of Ukraine, Article 3 of the Constitution outlines human rights and freedoms.Elements of the System of State Ukraine are: Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, President of Ukraine, National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, local state administrations, courts, Constitutional Court of Ukraine. Connections of elements of the system of the State of Ukraine. Legislative, executive and judicial bodies shall exercise their powers within the limits established by this Constitution and in accordance with the laws of Ukraine (Article 6 of the Constitution) ; В статье на основе методики системного анализа обосновывается понимание Конституции как прагматичной вербальной модели системы государства Украина. Рассматривается её соответствие требованиям, которые предъявляются к моделям системных объектов. Обозначена принадлежность этой модели к разным классификационным группам ; У статті на засадах методики системного аналізу обґрунтовано розуміння Конституції як прогностичної вербальної моделі системи держави Україна. Розглянуто її відповідність вимогам, які висуваються до моделей системних об'єктів. Окреслено належність цієї моделі до різних класифікаційних груп

Розглянуто сутність держави Україна як системного об'єкта. Обґрунтовано доцільність використання системного підходу до розроблення заходів запобігання корупції в Україні. ; Рассматривается сущность государства Украина как системного объекта. Обосновывается целесообразность использования системного похода в разработке мер предупреждения коррупции в Украине. ; The article reveals the relevance of corruption in Ukraine. The expediency of using a system hike in the implementation of its prevention measures is indicated. The essence of the state of Ukraine as a system object is substantiated.The reform of the domestic anti-corruption system is an urgent task. His decision requires new scientific developments.The development of anti-corruption measures in domestic science was mainly implemented analytical and descriptive approach. We have the work on the basic principles of the system analysis of crime prevention, genetic and prognostic aspects of this activity, systemic factors of the lationization of criminogenic factors, and the extent of protected social relations. This gives grounds for arguing that the use of system engineering as a theoretical basis for the development of anti-corruption measures is warranted. In addition, the system approach is now approved as a priority methodology in preventing corruption in executive bodies and local self-government bodies at the normative level (in item 14 of the State Program on the implementation of the principles of state anti-corruption policy in Ukraine (Anticorruption Strategy) for 2015–2017. The purpose of the work is to minimize corruption in Ukrainian society. And the specific task is to justify the state of Ukraine as a system, where corruption is a systemic problem of its functionality. Specialists have no unity in understanding the notion of "system". In our substantiation of the state of Ukraine as a system object, we consider it possible to recognize as obligatory those system features that are currently being agreed upon by the majority of system technician specialists:1) the presence of structural elements, which together represent a unique reality;2) the interconnection and interdependence of these elements;3) the only purpose or appointment of system elements.The first systemic sign for the system of state Ukraine is confirmed by the fact of the uncertainty of state bodies. In the material aspect, social relations are actions or inactivity of people, in energy – transmission (spending) of different types of energy, in the information – the change of the essence and volumes of information. And it is the relationships that are those connections that combine the elements of the state system of Ukraine.The purpose of the state system of Ukraine can be outlined in accordance with Article 3 of the Ukrainian Constitution: the direction of the state's activity determines human rights and freedoms.The systemic function of the state of Ukraine can be defined by the activity of asserting and securing human rights and freedoms, which is outlined in Article 3 of the Constitution of Ukraine as the main duty of the state. Guarantees (guarantees) of human rights and freedoms – the content of state activities in accordance with Article 3 of the Constitution of Ukraine.Corruption can be considered as a phenomenon that creates a problem of changing the normatively defined purpose of the state system of Ukraine – guaranteeing human rights and freedoms to antisocial – guaranteeing (providing) personal interests of corrupt officials.As a result, there is also a problem of obstacles to the realization of the rights of citizens, which in the sense of the system approach and in fact represents a problem of failure to achieve the goal of the state system of Ukraine.

У статті з використанням методики системного аналізу формалізуються проблеми, що існують у системі держави Україна, пов'язані з корупцією, та обґрунтовуються їх вербальні моделі. Звертається увага на різний зміст і ступінь проблемності корупції для окремих груп населення країни. ; В статье на основе методики системного анализа формализуются проблемы, которые существуют в системе государства Украина, связанные с коррупцией, обосновываются три их вербальные модели. Обращается внимание на различное содержание и степень проблемности коррупции для отдельных групп населения. ; Corruption has become a real threat to the independence of the Ukrainian state. Developing effective measures to prevent it is a challenge for the future existence of the country.System engineering is a recognized methodology for solving problems in systems. Our own experience confirms the prospect of using a systematic approach to solving the problem of corruption.Formulating a problem is a mandatory step in any scientific research. Therefore, the task of our work, we determined the formalization of the problem of corruption on the basis of system engineering.The problem is the discrepancy between the desired (existing, expected, compulsory) state of things in the system and the results of its functioning.The results of their own work substantiate three problems, which are caused by corruption in the state system of Ukraine, and construct their verbal models.The first problem. In connection with corrupt acts, the normative functionality of state entities with equal, unbiased and free access of the population to social benefits is replaced by their optional and selective functionality (according to the personal interests of corrupt persons). But the actual functionality of the state system of Ukraine is problematically not consistent with its official purpose. And corruption in the state of Ukraine replaces its official appointment (guaranteeing human rights and freedoms) to another - guaranteeing personal interests and the needs of corrupt officials.The second problem caused by corruption is the problem of interaction of the state system of Ukraine with its environment.The third problem caused by corruption is the problem of inconsistency of the structure, composition and processes of interaction of certain parts of the system of the state of Ukraine with the aims of its creation.

У статті з використанням методики системного аналізу формалізуються проблеми, що існують у системі держави Україна, пов'язані з корупцією, та обґрунтовуються їх вербальні моделі. Звертається увага на різний зміст і ступінь проблемності корупції для окремих груп населення країни. ; В статье на основе методики системного анализа формализуются проблемы, которые существуют в системе государства Украина, связанные с коррупцией, обосновываются три их вербальные модели. Обращается внимание на различное содержание и степень проблемности коррупции для отдельных групп населения. ; Corruption has become a real threat to the independence of the Ukrainian state. Developing effective measures to prevent it is a challenge for the future existence of the country.System engineering is a recognized methodology for solving problems in systems. Our own experience confirms the prospect of using a systematic approach to solving the problem of corruption.Formulating a problem is a mandatory step in any scientific research. Therefore, the task of our work, we determined the formalization of the problem of corruption on the basis of system engineering.The problem is the discrepancy between the desired (existing, expected, compulsory) state of things in the system and the results of its functioning.The results of their own work substantiate three problems, which are caused by corruption in the state system of Ukraine, and construct their verbal models.The first problem. In connection with corrupt acts, the normative functionality of state entities with equal, unbiased and free access of the population to social benefits is replaced by their optional and selective functionality (according to the personal interests of corrupt persons). But the actual functionality of the state system of Ukraine is problematically not consistent with its official purpose. And corruption in the state of Ukraine replaces its official appointment (guaranteeing human rights and freedoms) to another - guaranteeing personal interests and the needs of corrupt officials.The second problem caused by corruption is the problem of interaction of the state system of Ukraine with its environment.The third problem caused by corruption is the problem of inconsistency of the structure, composition and processes of interaction of certain parts of the system of the state of Ukraine with the aims of its creation.

У статті викладено результати предметної форми опису системи запобігання злочинності в Україні. За результатами субстрактного та структурного аналізу розкрито її елементи, внутрішні та зовнішні зв'язки. Елементами системи визначені правоохоронні органи країни. Глибину системного аналізу окреслено на рівні функцій суб'єктів правоохоронної діяльності. Щодо запобігання злочинності внутрішніми визначені інформаційні зв'язки між елементами системи (передача інформації між суб'єктами запобіжної діяльності про злочини, злочинців та поточну роботу відповідно до норм законодавства України). Зовнішні зв'язки системи запобігання злочинності – це її зв'язки з суспільством, звідки отримуються матерія, енергія та інформація. У системі запобігання злочинності реалізуються координаційні зв'язки – наради правоохоронних органів; взаємний обмін інформацією; доручення на виконання певних дій; спільне планування і реалізація заходів запобігання злочинів. Субкоординаційні зв'язки підпорядкованості реалізуються в межах ієрархічної структури правоохоронних відомств. ; В статье изложены результаты предметной формы описания системы предупреждения преступности в Украине. По результатам субстрактного и структурного анализа раскрыты ее элементы, внутренние и внешние связи. Элементами системы определены правоохранительные органы страны. Внутренние связи – передача информации о преступниках, преступлениях и текущей деятельности. Внешние связи – это связи, по которым передается материя, энергия и информация из охраняемых общественных отношений. Координационные связи – совещания, обмен информацией, поручения на выполнение действий, совместное планирование и реализация мер предупреждения преступности. Субкоординационные связи реализуются в иерархии правоохранительных органов. ; Activities of the National Crime Prevention is a system object. Therefore, it should be improving on the basis of systems analysis techniques.The practice of systematic approach was realized in the works of N. F. Kuznetsova, A. I. Dolgova, D. O. Li, V. M. Dryomin, O. Y. Manokha, O. G. Frolova. Crime models developed C. Y. Vitsin, Y. D. Bluvshteyn, N. V. Smetanina.We previously disclosed basic principles of system analysis system to prevent crime and its genetic and prognostic aspects, classification features, systemic factors latentyzatsiyi criminogenic factors - object protective activity, the amount of protected public relations.In order to investigate the systemic properties of the system of crime prevention in Ukraine we have defined objectives of the study - to its morphological analysis.Elements of a specialized system of crime prevention - a prosecution, Interior, Security Service, the Military Service of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, bodies of state border protection agencies revenues and fees, enforcement and penal institutions, remand centers, public financial control, fisheries, the state forest protection.We determined depth analysis of your system functions at the level of law enforcement agencies.Intercom system to prevent crime is information links between elements of the system (transfer of information on crimes and criminals current activity).External relations systems provide processes of interaction with the environment. For crime prevention system external relations are relations of elements (law enforcement) society.In the system of crime prevention implemented such coordination links:1) Departmental coordination meeting of law enforcement agencies;2) inter-agency coordination meeting of law enforcement agencies (Prosecutor General of Ukraine, the State Border Service of Ukraine and others.)3) mutual exchange of information;4) order the prosecution, SBU on other agencies to perform certain actions;5) joint planning and implementation of measures to prevent crime.Subkoordynatsiyni relations of subordination implemented within the hierarchical structure of law enforcement agencies.The material deepens knowledge of elemental composition and structure of crime prevention in Ukraine. At the same time it is an information base for modeling.We can argue about the newness of the data. But these data are primary, because this study is limited overhead (departmental) level structure of crime prevention. While they, together with earlier practices is the basis for modeling the system.

У статті викладено результати предметної форми опису системи запобігання злочинності в Україні. За результатами субстрактного та структурного аналізу розкрито її елементи, внутрішні та зовнішні зв'язки. Елементами системи визначені правоохоронні органи країни. Глибину системного аналізу окреслено на рівні функцій суб'єктів правоохоронної діяльності. Щодо запобігання злочинності внутрішніми визначені інформаційні зв'язки між елементами системи (передача інформації між суб'єктами запобіжної діяльності про злочини, злочинців та поточну роботу відповідно до норм законодавства України). Зовнішні зв'язки системи запобігання злочинності – це її зв'язки з суспільством, звідки отримуються матерія, енергія та інформація. У системі запобігання злочинності реалізуються координаційні зв'язки – наради правоохоронних органів; взаємний обмін інформацією; доручення на виконання певних дій; спільне планування і реалізація заходів запобігання злочинів. Субкоординаційні зв'язки підпорядкованості реалізуються в межах ієрархічної структури правоохоронних відомств. ; В статье изложены результаты предметной формы описания системы предупреждения преступности в Украине. По результатам субстрактного и структурного анализа раскрыты ее элементы, внутренние и внешние связи. Элементами системы определены правоохранительные органы страны. Внутренние связи – передача информации о преступниках, преступлениях и текущей деятельности. Внешние связи – это связи, по которым передается материя, энергия и информация из охраняемых общественных отношений. Координационные связи – совещания, обмен информацией, поручения на выполнение действий, совместное планирование и реализация мер предупреждения преступности. Субкоординационные связи реализуются в иерархии правоохранительных органов. ; Activities of the National Crime Prevention is a system object. Therefore, it should be improving on the basis of systems analysis techniques.The practice of systematic approach was realized in the works of N. F. Kuznetsova, A. I. Dolgova, D. O. Li, V. M. Dryomin, O. Y. Manokha, O. G. Frolova. Crime models developed C. Y. Vitsin, Y. D. Bluvshteyn, N. V. Smetanina.We previously disclosed basic principles of system analysis system to prevent crime and its genetic and prognostic aspects, classification features, systemic factors latentyzatsiyi criminogenic factors - object protective activity, the amount of protected public relations.In order to investigate the systemic properties of the system of crime prevention in Ukraine we have defined objectives of the study - to its morphological analysis.Elements of a specialized system of crime prevention - a prosecution, Interior, Security Service, the Military Service of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, bodies of state border protection agencies revenues and fees, enforcement and penal institutions, remand centers, public financial control, fisheries, the state forest protection.We determined depth analysis of your system functions at the level of law enforcement agencies.Intercom system to prevent crime is information links between elements of the system (transfer of information on crimes and criminals current activity).External relations systems provide processes of interaction with the environment. For crime prevention system external relations are relations of elements (law enforcement) society.In the system of crime prevention implemented such coordination links:1) Departmental coordination meeting of law enforcement agencies;2) inter-agency coordination meeting of law enforcement agencies (Prosecutor General of Ukraine, the State Border Service of Ukraine and others.)3) mutual exchange of information;4) order the prosecution, SBU on other agencies to perform certain actions;5) joint planning and implementation of measures to prevent crime.Subkoordynatsiyni relations of subordination implemented within the hierarchical structure of law enforcement agencies.The material deepens knowledge of elemental composition and structure of crime prevention in Ukraine. At the same time it is an information base for modeling.We can argue about the newness of the data. But these data are primary, because this study is limited overhead (departmental) level structure of crime prevention. While they, together with earlier practices is the basis for modeling the system.